Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emily Seibold vs Alexandra Alegre Ferre Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Seibold vs Ferre analysis and find out who is favored!
Emily Seibold vs Alexandra Alegre Ferre Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Seibold 1 - 0 Ferre
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Seibold has won 44.97% of points on their second serve, while Ferre has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Seibold, in recent form, has won 60.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ferre has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.74% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Seibold has saved 60.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ferre has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Seibold has won 44.83% of matches played (W/L 13/ 16), with Ferre winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Seibold has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 35/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Ferre has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 11/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Seibold has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 26.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 11), where as Ferre has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Seibold winning 1 times and Ferre being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Seibold winning 2 and Ferre winning 0. The last match between Seibold and Ferre was at the Las Palmas De Gran Canaria, 07-08-2017, Q3, Clay with Emily Seibold getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Seibold and Ferre have played a deciding set 0 times, with Seibold winning 0 times and Ferre 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Seibold winning 0, and Ferre 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Seibold has played against opponents with an average rank of 217.55 while Ferre has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Seibold has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ferre has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Seibold has converted 49.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ferre has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
824
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
53% (147-129)
Career Total W/L
30% (13-31)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Emily Seibold vs Alexandra Alegre Ferre For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Seibold VS Ferre
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Emily Seibold | Alexandra Alegre Ferre |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emily Seibold | Alexandra Alegre Ferre |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (26/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (205/167) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.71 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (737/1184) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (471/737) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (201/447) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (88/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (612/1263) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Emily Seibold Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Selina Dal
Player
Emily Seibold
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
18 of
30)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Emily Seibold
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gina Feistel
Player
Emily Seibold
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
79%
(
92 of
117)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
50 of
92)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
117)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isis Louise Van Den Broek
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Isabelle Cherny
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Marie Mettraux
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Emily Seibold
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Emily Seibold
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Seibold
Player
Jazmin Ortenzi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexandra Alegre Ferre Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Victoria Negoita
Player
Alexandra Alegre Ferre
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
66
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Ghitescu
Player
Alexandra Alegre Ferre
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Yakimova
Player
Alexandra Alegre Ferre
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Seibold Vs Ferre Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Seibold are available here and Ferre photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
